Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
- Textbook: review Chapter 6
- Minimum of 5 scholarly sources (You may include sources you developed in Week 3 if they meet scholarly criteria).
Introduction
You have arrived at the third part of the Course Project. By this week, you should have collected the sources that you need to support, with relevant evidence, the position you have taken on the issue you chose, and the three aspects of the issue you will write about. This week you will submit a thesis statement and an annotated bibliography of at least five sources that you will use in your paper.
Instructions
This week, submit the following:
- A thesis statement stating your opinion/conclusion on the issue, the supporting points you will offer and at least one relevant opposing view you will address.
- An annotated bibliography with evaluation of at least five (5) sources you intend to use in your final paper to support your claim.
- These are sources that provide evidence to support that your claim should be accepted by the reader.
- Scholarly sources are preferred and should be used where available; due to the nature of some of the topics, authoritative articles in very high quality substantive journals may also be acceptable.
Use the Source Evaluation Worksheet to determine the following:
- If your source is current
- If it is not current, explain why you think it is acceptable.
- If your source is credible, reliable, and authoritative
- How well your source supports your thesis
- If the annotation does not make this obvious, explain to your instructor how you will use it.
- If your support is popular
- If it is, explain to your instructor why you think it is acceptable.
Prepare a citation, annotation, and evaluation for each source.
ANSWER:
For a couple of decades, a significant number of advocates of hearth care reforms have worked for uncountable years to establish a national health insurance coverage and expressed a public single-payer system that will not include the industry of insurance in America. This was a proposal that was first generated by president Clinton. For many years the country has been applying the multiplayer system. This system has become too expensive, consuming a very significant portion of the country’s budget. If this system were to be adopted, it would create an environment with no global limitation on health care resources. This will render patients think that health care resources are not scarce and do not require a rationale. It will also foster a belief that since everybody is entitled to unlimited longevity and good health, there is no need to set boundaries on one’s care. As the single-payer system is more effective as it is highly cost-effective
Annotated Bibliography
Galvani, A. P., Parpia, A. S., Pandey, A., Zimmer, C., Kahn, J. G., & Fitzpatrick, M. C. (2020). The imperative for universal healthcare to curtail the COVID-19 outbreak in the USA. Clinical Medicine.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100380
This research was conducted to excavate what benefits the single-payer will have to the potential beneficiaries. This research was conducted following the most recent pandemic of the dangerous virus, the Covid-19. It explains … CONTINUE READING