One of the main jobs of historians is to interpret the past by reviewing primary documents, scholarly secondary sources, and then creating an analysis of this research. After reading your text and reviewing the assigned materials, submit an analysis of the legacy of Henry Clay’s political career.
You might want to consider the following questions, but you are not limited to them: Though Clay first came to Congress as a Warhawk, he gained the reputation as the “Great Compromiser.” Do you believe Clay should be remembered more for his compromises or for his other accomplishments in American government? How did Clay evolve over the course of his political career? Since he ran for president so many times and never won, how will he be remembered?
This assignment should be at least 250 words and contain your reactions or questions about some specific issue within the historical narrative which you find compelling. For full credit, your paper must not simply sum up the reading or repeat points made there. Rather, I’m looking for you to create your own interpretation, explain the emotional content of the piece, or discuss some original insight. Include citations as needed.
ANSWER
Clay was nicknamed a great compromiser because of a number of reasons. In the 1820s, Clay was instrumental in the crafting and passing of the Missouri Compromise of 1820, though it proved a short-lived solution to slavery. He also steered two more landmark compromises, including the compromise of 1850 and the Tariff compromise of 1833. By crafting the three… To continue reading, click on the purchase button below