INSTRUCTIONS
In this Discussion, you will address the following questions: Do you think it is wise to think about the ethical/theological terms ‘good’ and ‘evil’ as being definable or indefinable? Second, if you think the term ‘good’ can be defined, offer a definition, trying to make sure that the statement, ‘God is good,’ or ‘God’s nature is good,’ or ‘God’s will is good,’ etc., is as substantial as possible and not merely circular. Finally, third, what problems are faced when ‘good’ is defined by referring to God as the standard of good? Discuss critically (You might read the short Platonic dialogue, Euthyphro, available in the public domain in a transition by Benjamin Jowett. Pay close attention to Euthyphro, 10a-11a, and especially 10a -10e.) You must document your sources to support your case, including textbooks and presentations.
ANSWER
I think it is wise to consider the ethical/theological terms “good” and “evil” as being definable since, with clear definitions of these terms, individuals can have a common understanding of what they mean and how to apply them in various contexts. If the problem of good and evil is undefinable, discussions about morality and ethics can become vague and unproductive. Defining good and evil provides a clear argument when articulating moral beliefs and principles. In this case, individuals become more precise …. To access full answer, click on the purchase button below to proceed.