INSTRUCTIONS
In this Discussion, you will address the following questions: What 2-3 replies to William Rowe’s evidential argument from evil do you think are the most helpful and most compelling? Do you think that Stephen Wykstra’s CORNES is a suitable reply to Rowe? What is the main point Wykstra is making? Also, do you think that Wykstra is right about applying CORNEA to the ‘appearance’ claim that ROWE has made? Why? And if so, to what degree? And, finally, do you see any other problems that need to be addressed or resolved here with Wykstra’s account? You must document your sources to support your case, including textbooks and presentations.
ANSWER
The most compelling replies regarding William Rowe’s evidential argument from evil are the free will defense and soul-making theodicy. According to the free will defense, evil results from humans’ misuse of their freedom. As such, God has granted humans free will to assist them in their personal and spiritual growth. Free will allows humans to be morally responsible by considering the impacts of bad choices which may result to evil. On the other hand, the soul-making theodicy presented by John Hick argues that evil is necessary to allow humans to develop virtuous characters….. To access full answer, use the purchase button below.